DeployU
Interviews / Frontend Engineering / Your app's state management is a mess. How would Flux architecture help?

Questions

Your app's state management is a mess. How would Flux architecture help?

architecture State Management Interactive Quiz
How Different Experience Levels Approach This
Junior Engineer
Surface Level

Just use Redux or Context—they fix state management problems.

Senior Engineer
Production Ready

The problem isn't the tool, it's the data flow. Flux enforces unidirectional data flow, which makes state predictable and debuggable:

The Flux Flow: Action → Dispatcher → Store → View

Unlike traditional MVC where data flows in multiple directions, Flux ensures data always flows in one direction.

1. Actions Plain objects describing what happened (ADD_TO_CART, USER_LOGIN). Centralizes all possible events.

2. Dispatcher Central hub that receives Actions and dispatches to all Stores. Processes one at a time—no race conditions.

3. Stores Hold state and business logic. Update in response to Actions, emit “change” events. Single source of truth for their domain.

4. Views (React Components) Listen for Store changes, re-render when state updates. Can trigger new Actions on user interaction.

Why this solves the “spaghetti” problem:

  • Predictable state: You know the exact path every update takes
  • Easier debugging: Trace the sequence of Actions that led to any state
  • Clear separation: Each part has a distinct responsibility
  • Scalability: Adding features means adding Actions/Stores, but the flow stays consistent

This pattern directly influenced Redux, MobX, and other modern state management solutions.

What Makes the Difference?
  • Context over facts: Explains when and why, not just what
  • Real examples: Provides specific use cases from production experience
  • Trade-offs: Acknowledges pros, cons, and decision factors

Practice Question

What is the core principle of the Flux pattern?