Questions
How do you handle errors in Go?
The Scenario
You are a backend engineer at a fintech company. You are writing a new service that needs to interact with a database. You need to make sure that you handle errors correctly at each step of the process.
The Challenge
Explain how you would handle errors in Go. What are the different error handling patterns that you would use, and what are the key benefits of Go’s approach to error handling?
A junior engineer might just ignore errors or use `panic` to handle them. They might not be aware of the importance of handling errors explicitly or the benefits of Go's approach to error handling.
A senior engineer would know that error handling is a critical part of writing robust and reliable code in Go. They would be able to explain the different error handling patterns and would have a clear plan for how to handle errors in a consistent and predictable way.
Step 1: Understand Go’s Approach to Error Handling
Go’s approach to error handling is different from many other languages. In Go, errors are returned as the second return value from a function. This makes it explicit that a function can fail, and it forces the caller to handle the error.
Step 2: The error Interface
The error interface is the standard way to represent an error in Go. It is a simple interface with a single method:
type error interface {
Error() string
}Step 3: Error Handling Patterns
Here are some common error handling patterns in Go:
1. Explicitly check for errors:
val, err := myFunction()
if err != nil {
// ... (handle the error) ...
}2. Create custom error types:
You can create custom error types to provide more context about an error.
type MyError struct {
Msg string
File string
Line int
}
func (e *MyError) Error() string {
return fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d: %s", e.File, e.Line, e.Msg)
}3. Use the errors package:
The errors package provides functions for creating and wrapping errors.
import "errors"
var ErrMyError = errors.New("my error")The Benefits of Go’s Approach to Error Handling
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Explicitness | Errors are explicit, which makes it easy to see which functions can fail and to handle the errors accordingly. |
| Simplicity | The error interface is simple and easy to use. |
| Consistency | The standard of returning an error as the second return value makes the error handling code consistent and predictable. |
Practice Question
You are writing a function that can fail in multiple ways. Which of the following would be the most appropriate?